There Are All Kinds Of People - 4680 Words

50 States of Gay There are all kinds of people in this world. People of different races, nationalities, descent, cultures, even sexualities and genders. The people who are not cisexual and/or heterosexual are part of the LGBTQIA community. Since they are still people, one might assume that they have the same rights as everyone else. But that is not the case. Even after all the community has been through, some places around the globe still refuse to give them their rights. But slowly the world is waking up and realizing that people, regardless of sexual orientation and gender identity/expression deserve the same rights as anyone else. The LGBTQIA acronym refers to any lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning, intersex, and/or asexual person. I will be using the shortened version throughout this paper, â€Å"LGBT†, but keep in mind that this also includes queer/questioning, intersex, and asexual people. Stereotypes have always been a large part of societal perspective, stereotypes pertaining to sexuality even more so. Sexual stereotypes suggest that all somewhat masculine women are lesbian and that all slightly feminine men are gay. The stereotypical mindset that being gay is just good fashion taste consisting of pastels and the like, a high pitched voice, better manners, more interest in the arts (and none in sports), etc. does not even begin to touch on what being gay actually is. Usually the people who stereotype have no idea what it is like to struggle withShow MoreRelatedThemes In The Outsiders By S. E. Hinton710 Words   |  3 Pagesboth use a theme that relates to people being the same, but growing up or living in a different environment. In To Kill a Mockingbird, the main character, Scout Finch, tells her older brother that there is not more than one kind of people. She tells him that â€Å"there’s just one kind of folks. Folks.† In The Outsiders, Ponyboy realizes that the people he thought were so much different than he was, â€Å"saw the same sunset.† This means that they weren’t so different after all. In To Kill a Mockingbird, JemRead MoreThe Types Of Emotions Are Observed And Experienced By People ( Zimbardo, Johnson Hamilton 2015 )944 Words   |  4 Pagesemotions people exhibit in their daily lives. Psychologists such as Robert Plutchick argued that there are more than 90 different definitions that can be used to describe emotions. The difficulty brought about in defining emotions can be rated to its complexity and varied nature that is usually internal. A basic psychological definition of emotions describe it to be a condition of feeling that its outcomes are typically psychological and at times physical changes that affect the way people behave.Read MoreAn Analysis Of George Saunders And David Foster Wallace Essay1356 Words   |  6 Pages Rascoe 1 English 120 October 10, 2016 Often times, many forget to be kind to one another. When we are performing out our daily activities we forget to think about other people. Individuals can be naturally selfish or self- centered. There are multiple obstacles working against our being kind to one another. Our own success being one of them. We must remember to put ourselves in the shoes of the other person, in order to understandRead MoreVideo Game And Violent Video Games1574 Words   |  7 PagesAlong with the rapid development of the internet in recent years, game and violence game have become companions of young people. We could not deny the fact that video game already has strong attraction for many people. Especially in today’s society, when work pressure is growing, gaming is an effective solution to relieve tension, dispel feeling of fatigue, anxiety. Playing the normal video game, which it not include any violence scenes, plus regulatory reasonable playing time can help players relaxedRead MoreThe Loss of Privacy Will Be a Major Consequence of the Computer Revolution1093 Words   |  5 Pagespurchase of any kind of product, chatting with any person doesn’t matter the location you are, or checking your monthly bank statements. However the Revolution also gave some other consequences rather than positive like the â€Å"Loss of Privacy†. The Loss of Privacy in the Computer Revolution refers to the gain of personal information about an individual a Company of any kind or other unknown individual has in possession acquired from a Computer. Computers make it a lot easier for any kind of OrganizationRead MoreLove Is A Distinct Feeling846 Words   |  4 PagesLove is very distinct feeling. However, the word love is difficult to define and understand. It is one of the most important aspects in every human’s life. In my opinion, love is utterly unconditional and is between many people, pets, or even things. Love is very important feeling that everyone should have. Everyone should show love and receive love, as it is one of the most powerful forces in the world. Love can be felt for family members, friends, pets, lifeless objects, partners, and many moreRead MoreTypes of Friends Essay1153 Words   |  5 PagesThere are a lot of important things in life. However, one of the most important things for people to survi ve in this world is friendship. Without friendship, people can die of loneliness. What do you think about your friends? Do you like your friends? There are a lot of different types of friends. There are friends that I like and some friends with whom I do not get along. Friends with positive characteristics such as reliable, trustworthy and faithful whom I usually get along with are the one thatRead MoreEssay about Dream Analysis768 Words   |  4 PagesNowadays a lot of people rely on therapy to solve personal problems. The kind of problems that a person can’t work out by him/herself. No matter what kind of a problem a person may have there is always help available through therapy to resolve those problems. There are over fifteen types of therapies out there that I know of. Behavioral Therapy, Cognitive Therapy, Family Systems Therapy †¦ are the kind of therapies out there, just to name a few. Although I am not in any need of any kind of therapy, butRead MoreThe Market ing Research Planning Process1092 Words   |  5 Pagesuseful to the client. Step 1: Identifying the Problem Identifying the problem is the first step in the marketing research planning process. You must find out what kind of data you are looking for. There are a few different types of data to be collected such as descriptive studies or causal studies. Descriptive is the kind of study that asks who what where when and how. The causal studies ask us more they why, they follow the line of thought that if one variable changes then the other willRead MoreUnderstanding the Scientific Field of Social Psychology Essay1565 Words   |  7 Pagesevery aspect of the social behavior of the people and also to understand their mindset and how it impacts their decision making capabilities. Social psychology is much different than other disciplines such as sociology, because it doesn’t use wisdom and anecdotal observations to lay out it facts instead it uses scientific methods and empirical study of social phenomena. Social psychology is always based on research of different subjects using all k inds of scientific methods. These research methods

Hard Rock Returns to Prison from the Hospital for the...

Hard Rock Returns to Prison from the Hospital for the Criminal Insane by Etheridge Knight In Etheridge Knights poem Hard Rock Returns to Prison from the Hospital for the Criminal Insane, he uses a fictional tale to describe the tyrannical elements of prisons while simultaneously conveying the oppression that those who defy authority face in society. Knight effectively utilizes imagery and analogies (implied or clearly stated) to appeal to the readers senses and draw them into the story (and ultimately the motif). The poems narrative is centered around a heroic character named Hard Rock. The name Hard Rock is a complicated pun on the American penal system and rock/jazz music as well. Although the term the Rock, is†¦show more content†¦After Hard rock received a lobotomy, Knight describes that he was turned loose, like a freshly gelded stallion, to try his new status. Despite the limited written description of the situation, the reader gleans a much more concise image of the event because of the analogy incorporated. The reader visualizes Hard Rock being released into an awkward environment (the prison) after being bereaved (gelded) of his free spirit, as well as the anticipation Hard Rock and the other prisoners experience. He had†¦split purple lips, lumped ears, welts above his yellow eyes, and one long scar that cut across his temple and plowed through a thick canopy of kinky hair†¦ Imagery is very effectively used by Knight in order to illustrate Hard Rock and incidents in the poem. Phrases such as bored a hole in his head, handcuffed and chained, the jewel of a myth, and barked in his face, paint vivid images in the readers mind. Knights use of imagery keeps the reader interested in the poem while slowly drawing the reader into the story (emotionally). This element ultimately proves to be very useful to convey the motif of the poem. Knights poem displays the corrupt elements of prison life while portraying an analogy about society. Since Hard Rock was a hero to the other prisoners, the authorities took extreme actions to end his defiance. This is an obvious reference to the civil rights movement and the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Hard Rock, like Dr.Show MoreRelatedKnight’s Poem, Hard Rock Returns to Prison from the Hospital for the Criminal Insane1024 Words   |  5 Pages Hard Rock Returns to Prison from the Hospital for the Criminal Insane is a poem by Knight, Etheridge. The poem is centered on a heroic character named Hard Rock. Knight’s poem is an allegory of oral tradition. The author depicts Hard Rock as a legend to all inmates, as his exploits are well known among the inmates. Because of his defiance, Hard Rock is sent to a Hospital for the Criminal Insane. When he comes back, Hard Rock has been lobotomized and changed into a different man. He is not the strongRead More Racial Oppression Essay1389 Words   |  6 PagesThese ideas are similar to those of Malcolm X, an American. Etheridge Knight, an author of poetry and winner of an American Book Award, read the Autobiography of Malcolm X while serving time in the Indiana State Prison. His poem, â€Å"Hard Rock Returns to Prison from the Hospital for the Criminal Insane† reflects the system punishing those that don’t adapt to the rules. Battle-scarred â€Å"Hard Rock was ‘known not to take no *censored* from nobody’† (714). His rebellious acts against the system, such asRead MoreEssay on True and Every Day Heros1421 Words   |  6 Pagesthose tracks towards them. The young girl noticed an elderly man lying on the tracks. She yelled to her father, â€Å"I have to, I have to move him, and I have to save his life.† These heroic words were the last words that this elderly father would hear from his daughter. That day pulling the man to safety the young Japanese girl was hit by the train while she saved the man’s life. Greg Botellio, Vivian Levo, and Josh Levs all of Atlanta, Georgia works for CNN news and reported on August 22, 2013 on

The Subcommittee on Terrorism and Homeland Security Free Essays

string(112) " or a citizen of the United States, anyone captured in the act of terrorist violence is considered a terrorist\." The Subcommittee on Terrorism and Homeland Security made a report on Counterterrorism intelligence Capabilities and Performance before the 9/11 attack. According to this report, one of the reasons why this tragedy was not prevented was their less than satisfactory management of resources particularly information that could have be used to forewarn about terrorist intentions. It was reported for example, that the FBI, Homeland Security and the other agencies had very limited ability to watchlist terrorist suspects because of their inadequate access to up-to-date data collected by the different agencies and resources. We will write a custom essay sample on The Subcommittee on Terrorism and Homeland Security or any similar topic only for you Order Now In addition, it was found out that the actions of the FBI were more towards the investigation of possible terrorist attacks and less focus was placed on the prevention of such. (Report of Subcommittee on Terrorism and Homeland Security, 2002). These features harmed the Intelligence Committee’s ability to foresee possible threats of terrorism. Needless to say, foreknowledge of an attack is necessary for its prevention. This necessitates infiltrating communities especially those with significant Arab populations. Still, it is important to note that this infiltration is not an act of discrimination but an act based on the great probability that those involved in terrorism would belong to such nationality. There is a greater probablility that sympathizers and supporters of terrorism would belong to the members of the Islamic population than other populations of different religions. The situation demands that efforts never go below minimum if the safety of the population is to be considered. But this infiltration has drawbacks. One, it sacrifices the people’s liberty and privacy. Two, it creates exaggerated fear among the people especially if the infiltration is most obvious. To minimize the resultant fear among the people, it is necessary that infiltration be done in the most discreet way possible. Clearly, barricading the community with FBIs would not be wise as this would not only cause alarm but would also harmful to the intelligence we are trying to gather. This demands the need for informants and secret agents in the said community, from the said community and in all parts of the community, including mosques. It is very important that informants who are to be sent are selected among those already living in that population. These people are already knowledgeable about their community; they know the important people; have a personal concern over the safety of their community and would be more knowledgeable in finding important information given the right directions. This limits the time and effort required for information gathering, focusing the officials’ efforts in the interpretation and analysis of data, which speeds the process of investigation. The result is a more efficient transmission of deeply analyzed information, which is exactly what is needed in the prevention of terrorism according to the Subcommittee on Terrorism and Homeland Security (2002). But then, using informants, especially if these informants were selected from the same community involved would entail precautions. The danger here lies on the informant’s loyalty. Since the informant is selected from those already living in that population, it would be wise to assume that his loyalty is not absolutely focused towards the progression of the government’s cause. The possibility that his loyalty would lie towards the side of a guilty individual or the investigated individual, who, like him belongs to the same community cannot be denied. Also it cannot be ascertained whether or not he is in league with the terrorists and is providing them with reports, or probably bound by the same ideals completely against the government’s. In using informants from the involved community, the danger lies in the uncertainty of one’s role: who is pulling the strings and who is the marionette. To manage this danger requires the use of a trusted agent who is beyond the bounds of devotion instilled by community membership. This agent would act as the control, monitoring the local informants’ actions and reporting any act that signals treachery. This way, it is possible to determine the reliability of the reports given, pinpoint possible leak in intelligence and manipulate information disseminated, to the advantage of the intelligence committee. Definitely, there is more to war ethics than preventing needless deaths through terrorism, that is, the need to protect the people has made it to the point that the liberty and privacy of the people are sacrificed. Some means of protecting the people such as expanded surveillance and â€Å"seize and interrogate anyone (O’Connor, 2006)† is in itself an act that would incise the people’s freedom. Infiltrating the community with informants and agents, may also, in a way, harm community’s liberty and privacy but in a relatively less degree compared to other counterterrorism strategies. According to O’Connor (2006), counterterrorism strategies involving technology and the use of informants are the most effective in terms of ensuring the people’s safety and at the same time limiting disadvantages in people’s liberty. In any case at this point, all actions aiming to provide people with their deserved safety entail a cost to the people’s civil liberty. 2. In any undertaking, it is very important to stick to the objective. This does not exclude counterterrorism, war against terrorism or any war for that matter. The war against terrorism is not an end in itself but simply a means to another end which are to protect the peoples’ rights to safety and to provide, in the long run, freedom. I intend to base my answers on these premises. All peoples in the act of terrorism or fighting against the ideals of counterterrorism with the intention of harm would be enemy combatants, without any distinction of citizenship, soldier or non-soldier. This is very different to the status accorded to different people involved in the war on terrorism today where they are classified as enemy combatant, unlawful combatants, prisoners of war or noncombatant, each with different provisions ideally based on International Standards. Whether or not a terrorist is a citizen of Afghanistan, or a citizen of the United States, anyone captured in the act of terrorist violence is considered a terrorist. You read "The Subcommittee on Terrorism and Homeland Security" in category "Papers" Simply being an American does not excuse someone from the punishment accorded to crimes of terrorism and the only possible status, rights and protection I could afford an American citizen in the act of terrorist violence is that of a criminal charged with terrorism. He will be interrogated, given a trial and punished according to law without disregard to his rights as human that is without the use of unnecessary torture. A foreign national engaged in terrorism in the United States would be treated in the same way, based on his actions and without regard to his nationality. There would be no more and no less harsh treatment given to a foreign national engaged in terrorism compared to an American counterpart. â€Å"American national birth should not protect American-born terrorists or fail to protect naturalized citizens (Criticisms of the War of Terrorism, 2006). † In affording rights, status protection and punishment, giving such special considerations would be a question to the justice system and to the real intent and objective of this undertaking. Counterterrorism is not a matter of nationality and citizenship. Counterterrorism is defending the peoples’ rights and freedom, a state’s sovereignty against people who disregard such ideals by instilling fear and uncertainty through violence. Double standards should have no place in the justice system. If nationality and citizenship is to be considered, in deciding rights and punishment, then the efforts to realize the underlying goal which is the safety of the people would be for naught. This would not be counterterrorism but a war against a specific community. This can be applied in the case of the American Citizen who fights against American forces. Again, this is beyond the matter of citizenship. If the American citizen fights against the American forces, he is considered as a threat against the realization of the objectives of the war against terrorism, which is to protect the innocent citizens. The American forces would have no reason not to fight back. Torturing any of these subjects would never be justified in the context of just war. I, personally would say that the torture of these subjects would not be necessary. Eliminating terrorism does not entail the necessity to torture any of the perpetrators of terrorism. Elimination and torture may be similar in a way that it would provoke the wrath of the enemy but they are different in a way that elimination is exactly what it is—that is, it is supposed to eliminate terrorism by eliminating its perpetrators possibly through conviction and application of just laws. Torture, on the other hand would only provoke the wrath of the enemy without the assurance of eliminating terrorism resulting in possible retaliation. Surely, the means of saving lives of peoples would not be limited on a torture or no torture system. Solving terrorism with terrorism is not only unjust but also unwise. 3. Disregarding popular theories on just war, let me say that a war that is just is a matter of perspective. To the leaders, all wars are just as long as it promotes the ideals and purpose they try to protect and achieve. To the US and maybe to some, the war against terrorism is just because its purpose is supposedly to protect the lives, safety and liberty of innocent people against terror. To the leaders of the terrorists, they are supposedly protecting a certain ideal. To some, war is a religious undertaking. Terrorism may be an unpopular act to most but to its supporters, terrorism is their means of fighting for their ideals and achieve their purpose, which they personally believe are just whether others agree or not. But to some people especially those affected negatively by this war, this war would never be possibly just. The families left behind by innocent people who died in the 9/11 attack and those civilians who have become victims of bombs would never think of agreeing to any argument saying that wars could possibly be just. Those who sympathize with these civilians and those who fear the possibility that someday they would become the unknowing victims of war would think the same way. Theorists, most popular of whom, St. Augustine, conceived of criteria that characterize a just war. The just war theory provided guidelines in determining when a war is just (jus ad bellum), how combatants should fight in war (jus in bello), and when to end a war (Just War, 2006). According to the Jus ad bellum, wars should only be engaged in if there is a just cause. Just cause means that wars should only be engaged in to correct wrongdoings, as an act of defense against threats to freedom, rights and sovereignty. The cause is said to be just if it is an act to resist aggression (Orend, 2005). Right intention is also necessary in a just war. Engaging in war for material gains is outside the scope of right intention. In general, intention should always be to defend or correct suffered wrong doings (Orend, 2005). The proportionality and last resort states that gains should always outweigh the casualties incurred and wars should only be engaged in if all other possible means have been exhausted to no avail. Jus ad bellum also emphasizes the importance of legitimate authority and the probability of success. War should only be engaged in if the chance of success is high because doing otherwise would undermine the theory of proportionality, also one criterion in considering a war as a just war (Orend, 2005). In engaging in a just war, combatants are expected to act in a way that violence and casualties are restrained and attempts to recognize human rights of both allies and enemies are made. According to the Jus in bello, combatants of a just war are expected to apply the principle of discrimination in which war is directed only to the perpetrators of wrong and definitely not to civilians. Similar to the Jus ad bellum, in the Jus in bello, proportionality is expected. In this case, the force to be implemented must be justified when compared to the problem that occurred and the possible good outcome. The more civilian casualties, the more the war being waged are questionable (Just War, 2006). The Jus in bello also preaches the use of minimum force, respect for prisoners of war, and derides the use of torture (Orend, 2005). In the same way, in the just war theory, wars should be terminated only with just cause: if both parties are willing to negotiate and violations made by the aggressor have already been recognized and vindicated; right intention, discrimination, proportionality and public declaration and authority (Orend, 2005). Fighting terrorism would cease to be just if it has lost the purpose and ideals which are its foundations. That is, if fighting terrorism has become a mere machination for purposes other than the ideals it stands for. Fighting terrorism would cease to be just if it resorted to unnecessary ways; if it violates human rights; if it in itself resorted to terrorism which is the exact ideal it is supposed to stand against. Fighting terrorism would cease to be just if it has become an act against the principles proposed by the just war theory. Others assert that the presence of any civilian deaths would define an unjust war (Bell, 2006). If all these would classify wars as unjust, then the impossibility of a just war is definite especially when applied to the war on terrorism. Still, criticisms of the just war theory stresses the inapplicability of the just war theory in the present real wars, such as today’s war on terrorism which is unconventional one. When fighting terrorist groups such as the Al Qaeda, the conventional guidelines for war become obsolete. Therefore, â€Å"just war† has to be redefined (Bell, 2006). 4. Schools, colleges, universities, the press and some institutions have the power to carry out or instill ideas among the people. Unfortunately for the government, these institutions are the breeding ground of radical ideas, some, supporting terrorism and most of which pertaining to anti-militaristic views attacking any actions involving the war against terrorism, inspiring terrorist support. People who incite violence when they glorify violent acts against America may be responsible, indirectly for such acts because of the inspiration they give. They are indeed indirectly accountable but they should not be punished unless they themselves engage in violent acts directly. America, as it professes, hold most deeply their love for freedom and democracy, and part of this freedom and democracy that they allow their people is the freedom to express one’s insights, beliefs and emotions. If a person feels like glorifying violent acts against America, if that person feels that in himself, he is against the beliefs and ideals that America stands for, then he or she is free to communicate, glorify or say anything about it whether or not it inspires violent acts among others. He should be free to say everything as long as he does not directly engage in such violence. It is, after all, his right. Now this freedom allowed to citizens is exactly what makes it difficult for the government to deal with schools, mosques and charities that indirectly support terrorism because imposing sanctions on such indirect actions would undermine the liberty that they strive to protect. The only thing the government can do is to make parallel actions that would negate the actions of the supporters of terrorism. If there are local institutions that support terrorism, then they would have to use their power to tap what available resources they have, to negate such support and ideals. They have to make an effort to promote their ideas and market it, indirectly targeting the ideas of the supporters of terrorism and at the same time, indirectly making an effort to reach out and win the key supporters of terrorism. Part of the war against terrorism is to put out ideas that make possible the perpetuation of support of terrorism and not the people who support these ideas (if they do not directly engage in terrorism). In this case the war against terrorism is simply not a guns and bombs war, but also a challenge to make some people realize the correctness of the ideas imposed. If the ideas that support terrorism start from ideas imposed by some institutions, then actions should be targeted toward making powerful institutions publicly support ideas like the government’s. Or better yet, infuse anti-terrorist ideas to the institutions that support terrorism. In a way, this would be propagating anti-terrorist ideas as well as killing ideas that support terrorism. 5. â€Å"The fight against terrorism is now the first and overriding priority of the Department of Justice. (US Department of Justice, 2004). † Following this is the revision of the US Patriot act, which expands the power of Intelligence Officials in gathering information. In general, the main purpose of this expansion is for a more efficient targeting and prevention of terrorism by revising previous acts that limited the government’s ability to gather and use information and provide sanctions to terrorists. The revisions include a freer access to information, allowing information sharing among government agencies, â€Å"strengthening criminal laws against terrorism and updating the law to reflect new technology (US Department of Justice, 2004). All these revisions are said to be required to eliminate hindrances to the investigation of terrorist acts. The main purpose of this revision is to provide a more efficient means of using critical information especially those related to terrorism. Prior to the approval of the USA Patriot Act was a report submitted by the Subcommittee on Terrorism and Homeland Security in 2002, analyzing the possible causes of failure to prevent the 9/11 attack. The main points of the report is the mismanagement of intelligence caused mostly by certain restrictions in the law prior to the 9/11 attack, and the need for certain revisions to accommodate the present need regarding terrorism (Report of the Subcommittee on Terrorism and Homeland Security, 2002). Apparently, the revisions in the US Patriot Act are the response. Undeniably, the revisions in the US Patriot Act are a significant incapacitation of terrorist plans and are a great advancement, although not absolute, in terms of reducing the number of terrorist attacks and thus, ensuring the safety of the people. This has been proven by situations exemplified in a report by the US Department of Justice in 2004 entitled, â€Å"Report from the Field: The US Patriot Act at Work. † The US Patriot Act has temporarily slowed and probably prevented many acts of terrorism, thus improving the perceived safety of the population. But this advantage comes with the price of increased deprivation of civil liberty. The Act could definitely justify secret wiretaps, increase arrests even at a lower threshold of evidence, increased secret access to personal accounts, records, technological usage, mails and conversations (O’Connor, 2006). The not so few accounts of erroneous arrests that have been recorded since the approval of the US Patriot Act confirm this (Criticisms of the War on Terrorism, 2006). Critics of Militarism and the US Patriot Act, and the proponents of civic liberty agree that â€Å"it is better to think before doing anything drastic (O’Connor, 2006). Those for the Patriot Act agree that in the war against terrorism, time is of the essence as a moment of hesitation could disastrously spell doom (Department of Justice, 2004). Another point to be considered in the US Patriot Act is the span of time when provisions of the Act would still be deemed effective in preventing terrorism and ensuring the peoples’ safety. Anyone motivated by a perceived moral cause would not be stopped by simple revisions of laws, or more appropriately, by â€Å"laws† per se. And this is exactly what characterizes the terrorists in question: their motivation to terrorize is beyond any physical or material cause; they are motivated by their perceived definition of morality and justice. Soon, they will find a loophole in the laws that are presently slowing them down, and continue towards their goals. The question now is would the government foresee possible threats that are beyond the treatment of laws? And if they do, how would they handle and prevent these possible threats? Would it spell more demands on the peoples’ civic liberty in exchange for the more extensive need for safety? And if they do, what if the bombs and terrorist attacks are mere guises to remove our attention from how they are working on their real target—the peoples’ liberty—the ideal the state is trying to protect. Because if you are a terrorist, what better way to attack than attacking the foundation of your enemies’ framework. Is it not possible that the state is unknowingly working towards the achievement of the enemies’ real goal? Although the approval of the Act has provided the government with better capability to reduce threats of terrorism, it is still very important, especially with the erratic movement of priorities, that such questions be given consideration and other threats to the peoples’ security continue to be studied, understood and monitored (Report of Subcommittee on Terrorism and Homeland Security, 2002). Given the present circumstances when the safety of the peoples is at risk, the US Patriot Act seems to be working satisfactorily in terms of preventing terrorist attacks. It would not be wise to change the provisions of the Act if the objective is to ensure the peoples’ safety. But it would be nice to be hopeful that there would someday be a proposal that would ensure the peoples’ safety without sacrificing the peoples’ liberty. At present, all we can do is choose the lesser evil, and think of ways to eliminate â€Å"evil† as a choice. References Anti-Americanism. (2006, August 5). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 02:02, August 6, 2006, from http://en. wikipedia. org/w/index. php? title=AntiAmericanism oldid=67844288. Bell, D. (2006). Can the War be Just? Or What is Just War Good For? In Crosscurrents Magazine. Retrieved August 6, 2006, from http://www. crosscurrents. org/Bellspring2006. pdf Criticisms of the War on Terrorism. (2006, August 4). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 02:03, August 6, 2006, from http://en. wikipedia. org/w/index. php? title=Criticisms_of_the_War_on_Terrorismoldid=67579159. Just War. (2006, August 6). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 02:02, August 6, 2006, from http://en. wikipedia. org/w/index. php? title=Just_Waroldid=67920472. O’Connor, T. (2006, June 6). Civic Liberties in Domestic Terrorism. In Megalinks in Criminal Justice. Retrieved August 6, 2006, from http://faculty. ncwc. edu/toconnor/429/429lect19. htm. Orend, B. (2005). War. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved August 6, 2006, from http://plato. stanford. edu/archives/win2005/entries/war. Report of Subcommittee on Terrorism and Homeland Security, House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on Counterterrorism Intelligence Capabilities and Performance Prior to 9-11 (2002, July). In Federation of American Scientists Intelligence Resource Program. Retrieved August 6, 2006 from http://www. fas. org/irp/congress/2002_rpt/hpsci_ths0702. html. US Department of Justice (2004, July). Report from the Field: The US Patriot Act at Work. How to cite The Subcommittee on Terrorism and Homeland Security, Papers

Detection and Management of Child Abuse Cases

Question: Discuss about theDetection and Management of Child Abuse Cases. Answer: Introduction Child Abuse is a hidden epidemic that children are suffering across the globe. Children are getting severely affected by the abuses that are physical, mental, sexual, and emotional. It is important to detect the signs of abuse and take steps to treat and bring them out of the trauma they are suffering from. Steps are taken to manage the situation, but still, a lot need to be done to make the world a better place to live (Gan, 2011). Issues, Measures, and Improvement Child abuse is a well-known suffering; steps to protect children against it are being taken. Still, the rate of child abuse cases is increasing every day. There are many factors that influence child abuses. Individual, family and environmental factors increase or decrease the risk of child abuse (McDonald, 2007). Victimization factor which includes childs age, special needs like intellectual disabilities, chronic physical illnesses, and mental health issues also added a risk factor. Social issues like a single parent or young parental age, low income, parental mental health, history of abuse of a parent, social isolation, parenting stress, and poor child-parent relationship lead to increased child abuse cases. Though these factors provide information about the children who are at maximum risk of child abuse and neglect, these are not direct causes and cannot predict the abuser (WHO, 2007). World-wide actions are being taken to detect and help the abused child and also measures are taken to decrease the child abuse cases. Ms. Lim a doctor working with Child Protective Services informed about a case where a child of 3 years was regularly beaten by her father when the case came to them they straight forward taken action and sent the child in the foster care (Rong, 2016). This is an example that measures are being taken to stop child abuse. There are other measures also like advising a parent if they are facing difficulties in managing children, teaching children about sexual abuse to prevent it. Along with it, there are few legislative frameworks to stop child abuse that includes The Children and Young Persons Act (CPYA), The Child Care Centres Act, and Inter-Ministry Working Group on the Management of Child Abuse ("Singapore landmark ruling in transgender child abuse case - BBC News," 2016). Many pieces of evidences that include scientific literature state that child abuse can be prevented. Still, little thought has been given to child abuse prevention regarding policy and research. A boy named Daniel lost his life as he was abused by his mother and her boyfriend who are now sentenced to jail for four years. Before Daniel, they had made a girl name Fiona also suffer the same faith, but nothing was done at that time ("Singapore landmark ruling in transgender child abuse case - BBC News," 2016). If steps were taken at the right moment, then Daniel may have survived. The report says The Ministry of Social and Family Development and Child Protective Services received more than 2,000 inquiries and reports of child abuse in the year 2015. Out of these 551 incidents were of serious abuse. From 2012-2014 there is an increase of 40% serious child abuse cases (Baharudin, Rong, Leo, 2016). This proves that existing measures are not sufficient to stop the increasing child abuse. St ern and serious measures need to be taken to stop the cruelty against children. Child Abuse is not a problem that has easy solutions. Though, improvement in the child protection, prevention, and treatment are not beyond reach. The greatest obstacle is the lack of information and awareness about child abuse and responding to child abuse. No serious legal rules are being in use that brings terror in the mind of people who abuse children (WHO, 2007). Some improvements that can be brought in the measures of preventing child abuse are by providing information for effective action against child abuse, making people aware how to prevent child abuse, effective and efficient care services for families of the victim that includes the protection for the victim and some stern rules in the law. All these together can help in decreasing the increasing rate of child abuse around the world ("Singapore landmark ruling in transgender child abuse case - BBC News," 2016). Conclusion Abusing innocent children mentally, physically, sexually, or emotionally cannot be justified in any way. It is very important that steps should be taken to identify if any child is going through the trauma of child abuse and serious punishment should be given to the abuser so that it cannot repeat his/her criminal task again. Information and awareness about child abuse and how it can be prevented should be given regularly till it ends completely. Children are future of the world if they have a traumatized childhood then they will not be able to prosper in their life with full happiness that they are liable of. Hence, it is important that everyone should take steps to prevent child abuse to spread its wings and harm innocent children. References Baharudin, H., Rong, S., Leo, L. (2016).Why didn't anyone protect Daniel from abuse?.The Straits Times. Gan, G. (2011).Management of Child Abuse in Singapore. McDonald, K. (2007).Child Abuse: Approach and Management - American Family Physician.Aafp.org. Rong, S. (2016).Playing a part in stopping child abuse.AsiaOne. Singapore landmark ruling in transgender child abuse case - BBC News. (2016).BBC News. WHO,. (2007).Preventing Child Maltreatment: a guide to taking action and generating evidence.World Health Organization.